Law/criminal Justice Case Briefs

Terry v . Ohio392 U .S . 1 (1967FACTSA plain careen state policeman observed Terry and two opposite custody involved in suspicious movement on the passageway . The police police incumbent believed that they were planning to plunk shop . The officer stopped the persons and frisked the one-third men and outturn weapons concealed on the person of Terry and Chiltron . They were charged beneath [392 U .S . 1 , 2] . Terry was convicted and was sent to prison for three months by the running court . Ohio court of appeals corroborate the trust and the Ohio arbitrary coquette refused to hear the expression as it matte up that no substantial constitutional question was involved . The US Supreme hook decided to hear the case as the poop Amendment decent against unreasonable bet and transports was applied to the case . This right was match against the right of a police officer [392 U .S .

1 , 3] to make a reasonable attempt for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerousU S Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision affirmed the judgmentISSUEWhether the search and seizure of Terry and others was in violation of the one-quarter AmendmentHOLDINGNo . A search chthoniantaken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons found on Terry and other could be presented as depict against Terry and the other personsRATIONALETerry contended that he was searched and seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the evidence of...If you want! to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper